UK law should ban school uniform in pornography to stop the sexualisation of children, and adults must take responsibility for enacting it

Source: Rose, Mae, Aylin and Willow. "We’re teenage girls fighting to ban the use of school uniform in porn. Why have you left it up to us? | Rose, Mae, Aylin and Willow | The Guardian." October 23, 2026. www.theguardian.com

The Gist

The authors, four teenage girls, say that porn and other media showing adults in school uniforms make girls who wear real uniforms feel unsafe and make harassment more likely. They want the law changed to ban this content, and they argue that adults and politicians should act instead of leaving it to schoolchildren.

Conclusion

UK law should be amended to ban the depiction of school uniform in pornography, regardless of the performers' actual age, and adults and politicians, not teenage girls, must take responsibility for making this happen.

Premises

  1. The incoming UK law banning pornography involving anyone pretending to be under 16 will not cover adults dressed in older-schoolchild uniforms, leaving a legal grey area.
  2. Sexualised depictions of school uniform, in porn, sex shops and mainstream media, associate children's clothing with sexual acts and normalise the sexualisation of minors.
  3. This association harms real children: girls feel uncomfortable wearing uniform, change their dress, and one in three girls reports being sexually harassed while in uniform, with many testimonies of catcalling and assault.
  4. Children's clothing, which is meant to signify unity, community, safety and learning, should not be coded as sexual, so only children should wear school uniform and it should not be portrayed as 'sexy'.
  5. The campaign has gained broad support from adults, MPs and ministers, and amending existing legislation is a feasible, quick route to closing the gap.
  6. Teenagers in the middle of their GCSEs cannot be expected to carry the burden of legal change, and adults and politicians who have pledged to protect girls have a responsibility to act.

Assumptions

View this argument on LogicFirst.ai