The Question 'Does Israel Have a Right to Exist?' Is a Manipulative Discourse Trap

Source: Rawan Abhari. "Stop Asking If Israel Has a Right to Exist." April 4, 2026. jacobin.com

The Gist

The author argues that asking whether Israel has a 'right to exist' is a trick question designed to avoid talking about Palestinian suffering. Instead of addressing real problems like displacement and occupation, this question forces Palestinians to prove they're not violent before anyone will listen to their complaints.

Conclusion

The question 'Does Israel have a right to exist?' is not a legitimate legal or political inquiry but a manipulative discourse trap that prevents addressing real Palestinian grievances and perpetuates the foundational contradictions of the post-WWII international order.

Premises

  1. International law does not recognize a 'right to exist' for states; it recognizes peoples' right to self-determination and prohibits territorial conquest
  2. The question functions as a political litmus test that forces Palestinians to provide theoretical assurances before their grievances can be heard
  3. Israel's creation represents a foundational contradiction in the post-WWII order - it was established through violating the very principles the order claimed to uphold
  4. The UN Partition Plan allocated most Palestinian land to a Jewish state despite Jews being a minority population owning little land
  5. The 1948 Arab-Israeli War resulted in mass displacement and killing of Palestinians, constituting territorial conquest through force
  6. Israel expresses Jewish self-determination while systematically denying Palestinians the same right
  7. The discourse substitutes abstract pledges for addressing material realities of military rule, displacement, and statelessness

Assumptions

View this argument on LogicFirst.ai