The NBA Should Stop Funding the WNBA Over Alleged Anti-White Racial Violence

Source: Shawn Fleetwood. "The NBA Is Enabling The WNBA's Anti-White Violence." August 10, 2026. thefederalist.com

The Gist

The author argues that the WNBA has a problem with black players being unfairly aggressive toward white stars like Caitlin Clark and Sophie Cunningham, and that the NBA—which funds most of the league—is complicit by not stepping in to stop it. He concludes the NBA should cut funding unless the WNBA reforms.

Conclusion

The NBA should stop financially backing the WNBA because it is enabling a pattern of anti-white racial violence and hostility toward white players.

Premises

  1. A flagrant foul by black player DiJonai Carrington against white player Sophie Cunningham, which Carrington characterized as related to 'white privilege,' exemplifies a broader pattern of violence against white players Cunningham and Caitlin Clark.
  2. This alleged pattern stems from resentment by the predominantly black (and significantly lesbian) player base toward popular white, heterosexual players who are bringing attention to the league.
  3. The WNBA has failed to adequately discipline or address this behavior (e.g., not suspending Carrington, coaches not fully backing Cunningham).
  4. The WNBA is financially dependent on the NBA, which owns roughly 60% of the league and has substantial financial influence over it.
  5. The WNBA is financially unsuccessful (losing $40 million in 2024) and thus survives only through NBA subsidy.
  6. Despite its financial leverage, the NBA has done nothing to push the WNBA toward reform or accountability.
  7. Therefore, continued NBA funding without demanding reform constitutes enabling this alleged pattern of racial violence.

Assumptions

View this argument on LogicFirst.ai