The Marxist-Islamist 'Red-Green Alliance' Is the Most Dangerous Partnership in American Politics
Source: M.D. Kittle. "The Unholy Marriage Between Marxists And Islamists Is Dangerous." October 19, 2026. thefederalist.com
The Gist
The author says Marxists and Islamists have teamed up and are behind the violent riots in France. He argues the same thing is coming to America through open immigration and left-wing candidates, so voters should reject them in November.
Conclusion
Marxists and Islamists have formed a dangerous alliance that is destabilizing France and now threatens the United States, so American voters should reject the candidates and policies associated with it in the November midterms.
Premises
- The recent French riots, which began as protests over economic grievances, are a Marxist-driven revolution aided by jihadists rather than ordinary unrest.
- Mass and open-door immigration into European countries has brought radical Islam into them alongside socialist revolutionaries, producing the current chaos.
- The same dynamic is now arriving in the U.S. through Biden-era open-border immigration policies.
- Left-wing candidates such as Zohran Mamdani and Abdul El-Sayed represent the Islamist-socialist intersection in American politics, and El-Sayed has alleged family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
- Some Islamic leaders in the U.S. openly state a desire for an Islamic America governed by Sharia, which shows the intent of radical Islam here.
- Historical precedent, notably Iran in 1979, shows that Communists and Islamists marching together leads to disaster for those who ignore the warning.
Assumptions
- The French riots are coordinated and intentional rather than spontaneous or driven by domestic grievances.
- Left-wing politics and Islamism are cooperating strategically rather than merely overlapping in some policy positions.
- Muslim or Muslim-heritage candidates who are socialists can be identified with Islamist goals.
- Statements by one imam represent a broader movement or threat to American constitutional order.
- The 1979 Iranian revolution is a valid analogy for contemporary France and the U.S.
- Immigration levels are the primary cause of the unrest, rather than economic or other factors.
- Mainstream media coverage that uses terms like 'unrest' reflects ideological bias or concealment rather than neutral reporting.