Progressives Should Not Rally Around Carrie Prejean Boller Despite Her Pro-Palestinian Stance
Source: Molly Olmstead. "A MAGA mouthpiece was fired for her pro-Palestinian views. What’s going on here?." March 13, 2026. slate.com
The Gist
The author argues that while Carrie Prejean Boller says some reasonable things about Palestine, progressives shouldn't support her because her views are actually based on antisemitic conspiracy theories and she's backed by extremists. Just because someone opposes Israel doesn't mean they're a good ally.
Conclusion
Progressives should not support Carrie Prejean Boller despite her pro-Palestinian views because her opposition to Israel is rooted in problematic antisemitic conspiracy theories rather than principled advocacy
Premises
- Prejean Boller's anti-Israel stance includes antisemitic elements like defending Candace Owens' antisemitic statements and promoting conspiracy theories about Zionist power
- She has amplified content celebrating white nationalist Nick Fuentes and shared posts about 'Zionist Israel' being 'the enemy of the entire Christian world'
- Her supporters include extremist groups like Catholics for Catholics, Steve Bannon, and January 6 insurrectionists, revealing the true nature of her coalition
- Her opposition to Israel stems from intra-Christian theological disputes and Catholic-evangelical tensions within MAGA, not genuine concern for Palestinian rights
- While some of her specific criticisms of the Religious Liberty Commission were valid, her broader political framework remains deeply problematic
Assumptions
- Antisemitic conspiracy theories are inherently problematic regardless of one's stance on Israel-Palestine
- The motivations behind political positions matter as much as the positions themselves
- Political coalitions reveal the true nature of a person's beliefs
- Progressives should be consistent in rejecting antisemitism even when it comes from unexpected sources