Powerlessness Fuels Denial, Which Undermines the Solidarity Needed to Overcome Powerlessness

Source: Peter Dorman. "The Political Economy of Cognitive Dissonance." October 19, 2026. jacobin.com

The Gist

When people feel they can't do anything about a problem, hearing bad news about it just hurts, so they're tempted to tune it out or deny it. That denial makes them less likely to join others in fighting the problem, which keeps them powerless. The author says this explains why some workers deny workplace dangers and why climate action stalls, and that rebuilding a sense of collective power is the way out.

Conclusion

Feelings of powerlessness make people more likely to deny uncomfortable information about problems such as workplace hazards and climate change. That denial weakens the collective action that could change those conditions, so building a sense of collective power is essential to breaking the loop.

Premises

  1. Holding conflicting ideas causes psychological discomfort (cognitive dissonance), and a common way to avoid it is denial: ignoring or disbelieving information that would generate mental conflict.
  2. Uncomfortable information has two effects: the discomfort of dissonance, and a usefulness value that comes from helping people act effectively on a problem.
  3. Usefulness value only materializes if people believe they have the power to act on the information. Powerless people get the pain without the gain, so denial becomes more likely for them.
  4. Silkwood illustrates this: Karen Silkwood grew more open to hard truths about radiation as she gained union-based leverage, while economically vulnerable coworkers who feared plant closure denied the evidence and sided with the employer.
  5. The same dynamic plausibly contributes to the muted political response to climate change. Despite alarming scientific news, decades of political failure have left many feeling abjectly powerless, so they tune out distressing news.
  6. This produces a self-reinforcing loop: discouragement from past failure leads to less attention to the problem, which makes continued political failure more likely.

Assumptions

View this argument on LogicFirst.ai