National Popular Vote Compact Undermines Constitutional Order and Election Security

Source: Chuck DeVore. "National Popular Vote Empowers States With Lax Election Security." April 21, 2026. thefederalist.com

The Gist

The author argues that the National Popular Vote compact is dangerous because it lets states with weak election security (like California) control who becomes president, while also bypassing the proper way to change the Constitution. He believes this undermines the Electoral College system that protects smaller states and maintains election integrity.

Conclusion

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact should be rejected because it circumvents constitutional processes and empowers states with weak election security to control presidential elections

Premises

  1. The compact allows states to effectively amend the Constitution without following the Article V amendment process that requires two-thirds of Congress and three-quarters of states
  2. The Electoral College serves vital constitutional purposes by maintaining federalism and preventing pure majoritarian rule
  3. States have dramatically different election security standards, with compact states generally having weaker voter ID requirements and verification processes
  4. California and similar states lack meaningful citizenship verification, relying only on signed affidavits under penalty of perjury
  5. The compact would create incentives for a 'race to the bottom' in election standards as states seek to maximize vote totals
  6. Nearly every jurisdiction in the compact maintains weak or nonexistent voter ID rules, unlike the 36 states that request or require voter identification

Assumptions

View this argument on LogicFirst.ai