Green Energy Policy Is Driving German Industry to the U.S., and Germany Must Pivot to Fossil Fuels and Nuclear

Source: https://www.facebook.com/americanspectator/. "Germany’s Green Dream, America’s Industrial Gain | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics." November 2, 2026. spectator.org

The Gist

The author says German energy costs, driven by green policies, are so much higher than in America that companies like Audi, Mercedes and BMW are moving production to the U.S. He argues Germany should drop its climate agenda and turn to its own gas, nuclear and coal to save its industry and protect ordinary people.

Conclusion

Germany's climate and energy policy has made domestic industrial production unsustainable, driving capital to the United States, and Germany should reverse course by developing domestic gas (North Sea, Baltic, fracking), returning rapidly to nuclear power and expanding coal mining.

Premises

  1. European natural gas prices are roughly 10 times higher than in the United States (TTF around €94/MWh versus Henry Hub around €8), and the gap is wider than ever (factor of four a year ago).
  2. Gas is the raw material, process energy and key competitive factor for chemicals, glass, steel and fertilizer, so such industries cannot remain competitive in Germany at these prices.
  3. German firms are shifting investment to the U.S. (Audi $4.5B in Georgia, Mercedes $4B+ in Alabama, BMW $1.7B in South Carolina), partly cutting German jobs, while German chemical output is down 20% from its peak.
  4. Germany also imposes heavier bureaucratic and regulatory burdens (about 7% of revenue per the Bundesbank), and investment flows to places with cheap energy and less regulation.
  5. The energy price gap is the product of German and European climate and energy policy, which German political and business elites embraced for subsidies and to remove Mittelstand competitors.
  6. The price gap will not close unless Europe radically reverses its energy policy.

Assumptions

View this argument on LogicFirst.ai