Chris Taylor's Radical Liberal Record Makes Her Unfit for Wisconsin Supreme Court
Source: M.D. Kittle. "Planned Parenthood Lackey Seeks Seat On WI Supreme Court." April 6, 2026. thefederalist.com
The Gist
The author argues that Chris Taylor shouldn't be elected to Wisconsin's Supreme Court because she's too liberal and would use the position to push a far-left political agenda instead of being an independent judge. The author points to her work for Planned Parenthood and her extreme positions as a legislator as evidence she can't be trusted to be impartial.
Conclusion
Chris Taylor should not be elected to the Wisconsin Supreme Court because her extreme liberal activism would compromise judicial independence and impose far-left policies through the bench
Premises
- Taylor worked as a policy director for Planned Parenthood for nearly a decade, demonstrating deep ties to abortion advocacy
- As a state legislator, Taylor was 'one of the most liberal members' who pushed extreme progressive bills including transgender bathroom policies and sanctuary state legislation
- Taylor's campaign is heavily funded by wealthy liberal donors and Democratic organizations, suggesting she would serve their interests rather than act independently
- Taylor has taken extreme positions on abortion, opposing even basic restrictions like 20-week limits and protections for babies born alive after failed abortions
- Taylor opposed popular voter ID laws and supported allowing non-citizens to vote, showing she's out of step with Wisconsin values
- Taylor's election would give liberals a 5-2 majority on the court, making it a 'rubber stamp for big government, far-left policies'
Assumptions
- A judge's prior political activism and affiliations predict how they will rule on the bench
- Campaign funding sources indicate future judicial bias and decision-making
- Judicial independence requires judges to have moderate or conservative political backgrounds
- Wisconsin voters generally hold conservative values on issues like abortion, immigration, and voting rights
- Supreme Court justices should not 'legislate from the bench' or advance political agendas