Biden's DOJ Conducted Corrupt Lawfare Campaign Against Trump Worse Than Watergate
Source: https://www.facebook.com/americanspectator/. "Corruption on a Larger Scale Than Watergate Just Happened Right Under Our Noses | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics." April 30, 2026. spectator.org
The Gist
The author argues that Biden's Justice Department ran a corrupt investigation against Trump that was politically motivated and broke federal laws. He claims this was worse than Watergate because it used secret subpoenas and frivolous charges to interfere with the 2024 election and silence Trump supporters.
Conclusion
The Biden administration's 'Arctic Frost' investigation represents corruption worse than Watergate that violated federal law and constitutional rights
Premises
- The DOJ subpoenaed records of Trump, Republican senators, and conservative organizations in secret without informing the subjects
- The underlying charges (alternate electors strategy and classified documents) were legally frivolous since these activities were either legal or selectively prosecuted
- The investigation violated constitutional rights including the Speech and Debate Clause by targeting congressional phone records
- The DOJ expedited trials during campaign season and filed motions close to elections in violation of their own 60-day rule
- The investigation's threefold purpose was to prevent Trump's 2024 election, intimidate election questioners, and deter future dissent
- DOJ and FBI officials committed federal crimes by depriving subjects of constitutional rights 'under color of law' and violating the Hatch Act through partisan political activities
Assumptions
- The alternate electors strategy and classified documents cases lack legitimate legal basis
- Similar document cases involving Clinton and Biden prove selective prosecution
- The timing and secrecy of the investigation proves political motivation rather than legitimate law enforcement
- Federal law enforcement should be completely apolitical
- The investigation's scope and methods were unprecedented and inappropriate