America Should Restore Swift Public Executions for Violent Criminals

Source: Samuel Kimzey. "Here's A Not-So-Modest Proposal: Bring Back Public Executions." May 18, 2026. thefederalist.com

The Gist

The author argues America should bring back public executions that happen quickly after conviction, especially for violent criminals whose guilt is obvious. He believes this would deter crime better than our current system and save money while preventing dangerous criminals from potentially being released.

Conclusion

America should bring back swift, guaranteed public executions for violent criminals, particularly those whose guilt is certain

Premises

  1. Current violent criminals with clear guilt (assassination attempts, murders) remain alive in prison for months or years instead of being executed quickly
  2. Capital punishment is effective at deterring crime by permanently preventing executed criminals from reoffending and inspiring fear in potential criminals
  3. Swift execution saves taxpayer money by eliminating the cost of long-term imprisonment
  4. Quick execution prevents the possibility of leftist judges or bureaucrats prematurely releasing dangerous criminals who then commit more crimes
  5. Public executions would send a clear deterrent message to potential criminals and enemies of America
  6. Modern society has become too soft and empathetic toward criminals due to liberal influence, requiring more severe punishment to restore effective deterrence
  7. Historical precedent shows swift justice worked effectively (McKinley assassination case resolved in under two months)

Assumptions

View this argument on LogicFirst.ai